Daily Brief

November 22nd, 2008

Even before receiving a frosty reception on Capitol Hill this week when they asked Congress for $25 billion in government aid, Detroit executives expressed a willingness to give up some of their sacred cows (if not yet their private jets).

General Motors, for instance, said it would not advertise on the Super Bowl in February — a major concession, considering that it’s been one of the three biggest advertisers on the N.F.L. championship game over the last two decades years.

What if that’s not enough in these trying times? What if G.M –



Go to Source article
from Spectator Live

Who will take over Citi?

November 22nd, 2008

As John Carney notes today, Citigroup’s market capitalization is $21 billion; that of Goldman Sachs is $20 billion. Can anyone say "merger of equals"? Nothing’s unthinkable in this market, not even the idea that you can tie two rocks together and hope that they float. Reportedly Lloyd Blankfein approached Vikram Pandit with a merger proposal in September, and was rebuffed; now, however, the matter is out of Pandit’s hands, and Citi’s board might be more amenable to such a suggestion.

A Citi-Goldman merger would give Citigroup much more credible management, assuming that the Goldman



Go to Source article
from Spectator Live

Will Brown let Darling tell us that he is going to hike the VAT rate to pay for the stimulus package?

November 22nd, 2008

As we learnt during the banking crisis, what Robert Peston predicts tends to become reality shortly afterwards. So, his informed speculation on what is in the PBR is well worth reading.

This passage is particularly interesting and appears to be the latest shot in the briefing wars, which has reached up to cabinet level, around the Brown-Darling fight over whether or not Labour should explain how it tax cuts and increased spending will be paid for:

“But he [Darling] will also announce deferred tax rises and deferred cuts in public spending -



Go to Source article
from Spectator Live

British terror mastermind Rashid Rauf ‘killed in US missile strike’

November 22nd, 2008

Rashid Rauf the alleged mastermind of a plot to blow up transatlantic airliners has reportedly been killed in a US missile strike in Pakistan.
Go to Source article
from Telegraph Major News

Rich countries launch great land grab to safeguard food supply

November 22nd, 2008

Rich governments and corporations are triggering alarm for the poor as they buy up the rights to millions of hectares of agricultural land in developing countries in an effort to secure their own long-term food supplies.

The head of the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, Jacques Diouf, has warned that the controversial rise in land deals could create a form of “neo-colonialism”, with poor states producing food for the rich at the expense of their own hungry people.

Rising food prices have already set off a second “scramble for Africa”. This week, the South Korean firm Daewoo Logistics announced plans to buy a 99-year lease on a million hectares in Madagascar. Its aim is to grow 5m tonnes of corn a year by 2023, and produce palm oil from a further lease of 120,000 hectares (296,000 acres), relying on a largely South African workforce. Production would be mainly earmarked for South Korea, which wants to lessen dependence on imports.

“These deals can be purely commercial ventures on one level, but sitting behind it is often a food security imperative backed by a government,” said Carl Atkin, a consultant at Bidwells Agribusiness, a Cambridge firm helping to arrange some of the big international land deals.

Madagascar’s government said that an environmental impact assessment would have to be carried out before the Daewoo deal could be approved, but it welcomed the investment. The massive lease is the largest so far in an accelerating number of land deals that have been arranged since the surge in food prices late last year.

“In the context of arable land sales, this is unprecedented,” Atkin said. “We’re used to seeing 100,000-hectare sales. This is more than 10 times as much.”

At a food security summit in Rome, in June, there was agreement to channel more investment and development aid to African farmers to help them respond to higher prices by producing more. But governments and corporations in some cash-rich but land-poor states, mostly in the Middle East, have opted not to wait for world markets to respond and are trying to guarantee their own long-term access to food by buying up land in poorer countries.

According to diplomats, the Saudi Binladin Group is planning an investment in Indonesia to grow basmati rice, while tens of thousands of hectares in Pakistan have been sold to Abu Dhabi investors.

Arab investors, including the Abu Dhabi Fund for Development, have also bought direct stakes in Sudanese agriculture. The president of the UEA, Khalifa bin Zayed, has said his country was considering large-scale agricultural projects in Kazakhstan to ensure a stable food supply.

Even China, which has plenty of land but is now getting short of water as it pursues breakneck industrialisation, has begun to explore land deals in south-east Asia. Laos, meanwhile, has signed away between 2m-3m hectares, or 15% of its viable farmland. Libya has secured 250,000 hectares of Ukrainian farmland, and Egypt is believed to want similar access. Kuwait and Qatar have been chasing deals for prime tracts of Cambodia rice fields.

Eager buyers generally have been welcomed by sellers in developing world governments desperate for capital in a recession. Madagascar’s land reform minister said revenue would go to infrastructure and development in flood-prone areas.

Sudan is trying to attract investors for almost 900,000 hectares of its land, and the Ethiopian prime minister, Meles Zenawi, has been courting would-be Saudi investors.

“If this was a negotiation between equals, it could be a good thing. It could bring investment, stable prices and predictability to the market,” said Duncan Green, Oxfam’s head of research. “But the problem is, [in] this scramble for soil I don’t see any place for the small farmers.”

Alex Evans, at the Centre on International Cooperation, at New York University, said: “The small farmers are losing out already. People without solid title are likely to be turfed off the land.”

Details of land deals have been kept secret so it is unknown whether they have built-in safeguards for local populations.

Steve Wiggins, a rural development expert at the Overseas Development Institute, said: “There are very few economies of scale in most agriculture above the level of family farm because managing [the] labour is extremely difficult.” Investors might also have to contend with hostility. “If I was a political-risk adviser to [investors] I’d say ‘you are taking a very big risk’. Land is an extremely sensitive thing. This could go horribly wrong if you don’t learn the lessons of history.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2008 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Go to Source article
from Latest news, sport, business, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

Rise of BNP is politicians’ fault - Blears

November 22nd, 2008

The British National party has made advances because mainstream political parties, including Labour, have abandoned sections of the white working class, ignoring people’s needs while taking their votes for granted, a government minister admits today.

Writing in the Guardian, the communities and local government secretary, Hazel Blears, warns that politicians must work hard at grassroots level to win back the trust and confidence of people alienated from mainstream political life.

With the BNP’s areas of strongest support revealed this week by the posting of the party’s secret membership list on the internet, Blears also calls upon her Labour colleagues to take their opposition to the far right to the streets in those places. “We must continue to campaign vigorously against the BNP: demonstrate, picket, leaflet and argue,” she says.

In a strongly worded piece, Blears argues that demonstrating against the BNP is not enough, however. “Shouting ‘Nazi’ is not the answer,” she writes.

The government, Blears insists, must devise a long-term strategy to bring different communities together, working with councils and different community groups; some Labour backbenchers have blamed the party’s drive to capture middle class votes for the rise of the BNP in some areas that were previously Labour strongholds.

Blears writes: “We must recognise that where the BNP wins votes, it is often a result of local political failure.” She adds: “Estates that have been ignored for decades; voters taken for granted; local services that have failed; white working-class voters who feel politicians live on a different planet. In such a political vacuum, the BNP steps in with offers of grass-cutting, a listening ear and easy answers to complex problems.”

Blears acknowledges that the BNP, under Nick Griffin, has a “cunning strategy”, and that it has “started a process of detoxification”. Using websites, blogs, newsletters and petitions, it has reached thousands and “played on people’s apprehensions”. It has peddled, she says, “pernicious but plausible lies”.

She points out that support for the far right remains small, but says a revival of mainstream politics is paramount in those areas where the BNP is now known to be at its strongest. Her comments echo what some Labour backbenchers and rank-and-file party members have been saying about the BNP’s strategy for several years.

There have been warnings that BNP activists have targeted neighbourhoods where few people vote in local or general elections, and introduced themselves on doorsteps as representatives of “a party that’s like Labour in your parents’ days”.

Blears is one of the most senior Labour figures to voice such concerns, and in such forthright terms. Her wake-up call came as the fallout from the posting of the membership list continued to be felt by the BNP. Police forces across the country were continuing to scour the lists for the names of serving officers - who are banned from joining the party. But the General Medical Council said it would not be taking action against any medical practitioners found to be members of the party.

In West Yorkshire, police investigating the petrol bombing of a car outside the home of a man whose name appears on the list were trying to establish whether it was the result of a vigilante attack. The petrol bomb exploded on Thursday night in Liversedge. The Peugeot 206, which belonged to a neighbour of the man named on the BNP list, was destroyed.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2008 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Go to Source article
from Latest news, sport, business, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

People who fail to tell authorities of amendments to personal details will face civil penalty fines

November 22nd, 2008

People who fail to tell the authorities of a change of address or amend other key personal details within three months will face civil penalty fines of up to £1,000 a time when the national identity card scheme is up and running, according to draft Home Office regulations published yesterday.

The Home Office made clear that repeated failures to keep an entry on the national identity register up to date could ultimately be enforced by bailiffs being sent round to seize property.

But yesterday’s detailed regulations to implement the national identity card scheme make clear that they intend to avoid the creation of ID card “martyrs”, by levying no penalty on those who refuse to register for the national identity card database in the first place.

The Liberal Democrat peer, Lady Williams, is amongst ID card “refuseniks” who have said they are prepared to go to jail rather than sign up for the scheme.

But the regulations show that the main sanction they are likely to face is being barred from leaving the country when it is time to renew their passport.

The regulations confirm ministers’ intention to make passports a “designated document” which means anyone applying or renewing their passport will be automatically issued with an ID card at the same time. Ministers claim that this does not amount to compulsion but ID card critics disagree.

The consultation on the fine detail of how the ID card scheme will work in practice published yesterday also makes clear:

• The £30 initial fee for a standalone ID card valid for travel in Europe only is capped for the year 2009/10 when it will be compulsory for airport workers and on a voluntary basis for students. The regulations allow for this fee to be “modified” in future years including by 2012, when it is anticipated that mass rollout will take place with 5-6 million combined passports/identity cards a year expected to be issued. Passport fees will be on top of this basic charge.

• If it necessary to change any of the details held on the card, such as name or fingerprints which entail a new card being issued, a further £30 will be charged. Changes of address or other details which do not appear on the card will not be charged.

• Transgendered people: those “moving from their birth gender to an acquired gender” will be able to apply for two ID cards - one for each gender. The second ID card will use a different name, signature and photograph although they will be linked as one entry on the national ID card register. Nevertheless they will be charged two fees for the privilege of holding two cards.

• Homeless people and others who live “transient lifestyles” will also be able to register under the scheme. The Home Office expects to be able to agree with homeless people a suitable place to be registered as their residence - presumably even if it is only a railway arch. Those who move around frequently for work will be able to register their principal residence without notifying each move.

But the draft regulations also set out in detail the escalating series of fines for those who fail to keep their ID card register entry up to date or fail to correct errors on it.

The kind of details that must be provided within three months are a change of address, a change of name perhaps because of marriage or by deed poll, a change of nationality, a change of gender, or a significant change in an individual’s face or their fingerprints perhaps because of an accident.

The Home Office say they will not need to police this aspect as it will soon become apparent when somebody tries, for example, to get on a plane with a ID card/passport with an out of date address that does not match that the bank debit/credit card they used to book the flight.

They say they may well find themselves not being allowed to travel. Those who lose their ID Cards or have them stolen will have to report the loss within a month.

Fines for failure to update the register start at £125 going up to £1,000 for repeatedly failing to comply. As a civil penalty the bailiffs may be sent in to enforce payment.

The shadow home secretary, Dominic Grieve, said the scheme was truly the worst of all worlds - expensive, intrusive and unworkable.

“The home secretary has confirmed the worst element of the scheme - a single, mammoth and highly vulnerable database exposing masses of our personal details to criminal hackers.

“Worse still, she has magnified the scope for fraud by allowing spot fines to be issued by email,” he said.

The NO2ID campaign say that in just four weeks in 2005, more than 10,000 people pledged online to refuse to register for an ID card.

“It is possible that refusal could be made a crime but the government has shied away from that so far. If enough people say no, it will be impossible,” said a campaign spokesman.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2008 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Go to Source article
from Latest news, sport, business, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand: A chronology of Sachsgate

November 22nd, 2008

By any rational assessment alarm bells should not merely have rung but exploded on the afternoon of October 15 when Jonathan Ross left an obscene message on Andrew Sachs’s answering machine when he appeared on Russell Brand’s show.
Go to Source article
from Telegraph Major News

Jonathan Ross to escape extra punishment

November 22nd, 2008

Jonathan Ross is to escape further punishment over the “Sachsgate” affair but all senior BBC executives are to waive their bonuses for the current financial year.
Go to Source article
from Telegraph Major News

Ross and Brand phonecalls to Andrew Sachs were ‘grossly offensive’ BBC

November 22nd, 2008

The obscene phone calls to actor Andrew Sachs and broadcast by the BBC were a “deplorable intrusion” the corporation’s governing body said.
Go to Source article
from Telegraph Major News